Introduction to the book of Leviticus
The Book of Leviticus receives its English title from the Latin Vulgate, which is derived from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) title Leuitikon (Λευιτικόν), meaning “Levitical” or “pertaining to the Levites.”
EOB: Official Site of the Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible (Old and New Testament)
EOB (Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible):
EOB Footnote:
KJV (King James Version):
WEB (World English Bible):
Benton LXX (Vaticanus):
Douai-Rheims (Vulgate):
Apostoliki Diakonia (LXX):
YLT (Young Literal Translation )(MT):
BBE (Bible in Basic English):
EOB Commentary:
THE SONS OF GOD AND THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN
This verse stands among the most debated passages in all of Scripture, presenting interpretive challenges that the Church Fathers addressed with considerable attention. The identity of the “sons of God” (bene ha-elohim) has generated three primary interpretations within the Orthodox tradition.
The Patristic Interpretation: The predominant view among the Eastern Fathers, championed by Saint John Chrysostom, Saint Ephrem the Syrian, and Saint Augustine, identifies the “sons of God” as the righteous descendants of Seth, while the “daughters of men” represent the lineage of Cain. Chrysostom emphatically rejected any notion of angelic beings cohabiting with human women, arguing that such a reading contradicts the spiritual nature of angels and introduces inappropriate mythological elements into sacred Scripture. For Chrysostom, this passage illustrates the catastrophic spiritual consequences when the faithful intermarry with the ungodly, allowing worldly beauty and desire to eclipse devotion to God.
Saint Ephrem similarly understood this mingling as the corruption of the Sethite line, which had preserved the worship of the true God. When these righteous ones abandoned their spiritual heritage for carnal attraction, the moral foundation of humanity collapsed, precipitating the Flood.
Typological Significance: This passage carries profound relevance for understanding the Incarnation. The Church Fathers saw in the corruption of flesh a foreshadowing of why the Word became flesh. Where the sons of God fell through disordered union with humanity, the true Son of God would unite Himself to human nature in the pure womb of the Theotokos, not to corrupt but to heal and deify. The contrast illuminates the redemptive purpose of Christ’s coming.
Spiritual and Ascetic Application: Orthodox spiritual tradition draws from this text important warnings about the dangers of spiritual compromise. The “daughters of men” represent the allurements of worldly life that draw the soul away from its heavenly calling. The monastic tradition particularly emphasizes vigilance against allowing physical beauty or material attachments to supplant love for God. Saint John Cassian and later ascetic writers would echo this theme when discussing the warfare against the passions.
Liturgical Resonance: During the preparatory Sundays before Great Lent, the Church reads from these early chapters of Genesis, reminding the faithful of humanity’s fall and the need for repentance. The pre-Flood narrative serves as a sobering reminder that divine patience, though vast, calls for human response. The righteous Noah, who appears shortly after this verse, becomes a type of salvation through the wood of the Ark, prefiguring baptism and the Cross.
This passage ultimately calls the faithful to preserve their identity as children of God, not conforming to the patterns of a fallen world but maintaining the purity of faith transmitted through the generations.
The Book of Leviticus receives its English title from the Latin Vulgate, which is derived from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) title Leuitikon (Λευιτικόν), meaning “Levitical” or “pertaining to the Levites.”

The Book of Exodus receives its English title from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), where it is called Exodos (Ἔξοδος), meaning “departure” or “exit.” This name was chosen because the central

I. Date and Authorship Holy Tradition of the Orthodox Church, affirmed by the Fathers and the liturgical usage of the Church from the earliest centuries, attributes the Book of Genesis

Does Hebrews 11 on the Maccabees Show Stronger Alignment with 4 Maccabees than 2 Maccabees? Hebrews 11 (the famous “Hall of Faith” chapter) does not explicitly mention the Maccabees by