EOB: Official Site of the Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible (Old and New Testament)

Genesis 4:22

EOB (Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible):

Zillah had a son named Tubal-cain, who made tools from bronze and iron. Tubal-cain’s sister was Naamah.

EOB Footnote:

The MT includes the additional phrase “sister of Tubal-cain” (Hebrew: “and the sister of Tubal-cain”) followed by the name “Naamah” at the end of the verse, identifying Zillah as having a daughter named Naamah who was Tubal-cain’s sister. The LXX omits this genealogical detail entirely.

Other Translations:

KJV (King James Version):

And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.

WEB (World English Bible):

Zillah also bore Tubal Cain, the forger of every cutting instrument of bronze and iron. Tubal Cain’s sister was Naamah.

Benton LXX (Vaticanus):

And Thobel made clear iron, and the sister of Thobel was Noema.

Douai-Rheims (Vulgate):

“Sella also brought forth Tubalcain, who was a hammerer and artificer in every work of brass and iron. And the sister of Tubalcain was Noema.”

Apostoliki Diakonia (LXX):

Zillah also bore Tubal-Cain, who forged all kinds of tools out of bronze and iron. And the sister of Tubal-Cain was Naamah.

YLT (Young Literal Translation )(MT):

“And Zillah, she also bore Tubal-cain, an instructor of every craftsman in bronze and iron; and the sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah.”

BBE (Bible in Basic English):

And the sister of Tubal-cain was Naamah.

EOB COMMENTARY:

EOB Commentary:

Commentary on Genesis 4:22

The Lineage of Cain and the Ambiguity of Human Craft

This verse introduces Tubal-Cain, the forger of instruments in bronze and iron, alongside his sister Naamah. Within the genealogy of Cain, we encounter the development of metallurgy and craftsmanship, which the Fathers viewed with considerable ambiguity. While human ingenuity reflects the image of God within us, the context of Cain’s lineage suggests that such skills, apart from divine grace, become instruments of violence and worldly power.

Patristic Interpretation

Saint John Chrysostom observes that the descendants of Cain excelled in earthly arts and sciences, yet their achievements served the fallen order rather than the Kingdom of God. The forging of bronze and iron naturally evokes the crafting of weapons, connecting Tubal-Cain to the violence that characterized his ancestor. Saint Ephrem the Syrian similarly notes that while Seth’s line preserved the worship of God, Cain’s descendants multiplied in worldly wisdom divorced from righteousness.

The Church Fathers also drew attention to Naamah, whose name means “pleasant” or “beautiful.” Some patristic sources suggest she represents the seductive nature of worldly beauty when separated from virtue, while others simply note her as part of the genealogical record.

Typological and Christological Dimensions

The Orthodox tradition sees in the contrast between the lineages of Cain and Seth a prefiguration of the two ways set before humanity: the path of worldly achievement without God, and the path of calling upon the name of the Lord. Christ, the true Craftsman, fashions not weapons of destruction but instruments of salvation. Where Tubal-Cain sharpened bronze and iron for earthly purposes, Christ transforms the iron nails of the Cross into the means of cosmic redemption.

Liturgical and Spiritual Significance

While this specific verse does not appear prominently in Orthodox liturgical texts, the broader theme resonates throughout the Church’s hymnography. The contrast between earthly craft and heavenly wisdom appears in services honoring the saints, who rejected worldly accomplishments for the imperishable crown. The Fathers consistently teach that human talents and technologies are morally neutral; their value depends entirely upon whether they serve the fallen self or are offered to God in humility.

This passage invites Orthodox Christians to examine how we employ our own skills and crafts. Are our labors directed toward building the city of Cain, or do we offer them as instruments of peace in service to Christ and His Church?

A Response to Fr. John Whiteford’s Review of the EOB New Testament

By Fr Laurent Cleenewerck, EOB Editor In 2021, Fr. John Whiteford published on his blog a substantial review of the EOB New Testament (Newrome Press portable edition). The review deserves

The EOB New Testament as an Orthodox Edition: A note on its character, method, and intended use

By: Fr Laurent Cleenewerck, EOB Editor The question is sometimes asked in what sense the EOB New Testament (the Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible) is properly an Orthodox edition and

Introduction to the book of Leviticus

The Book of Leviticus receives its English title from the Latin Vulgate, which is derived from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) title Leuitikon (Λευιτικόν), meaning “Levitical” or “pertaining to the Levites.”

Introduction to the book of Exodus

The Book of Exodus receives its English title from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), where it is called Exodos (Ἔξοδος), meaning “departure” or “exit.” This name was chosen because the central

Introduction to the book of Genesis

I. Date and Authorship Holy Tradition of the Orthodox Church, affirmed by the Fathers and the liturgical usage of the Church from the earliest centuries, attributes the Book of Genesis

Hebrews 11:35–38 and… 4 Maccabees

Does Hebrews 11 on the Maccabees Show Stronger Alignment with 4 Maccabees than 2 Maccabees? Hebrews 11 (the famous “Hall of Faith” chapter) does not explicitly mention the Maccabees by