Introduction to the book of Leviticus
The Book of Leviticus receives its English title from the Latin Vulgate, which is derived from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) title Leuitikon (Λευιτικόν), meaning “Levitical” or “pertaining to the Levites.”
EOB: Official Site of the Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible (Old and New Testament)
EOB (Eastern / Greek Orthodox Bible):
EOB Footnote:
KJV (King James Version):
WEB (World English Bible):
Benton LXX (Vaticanus):
Douai-Rheims (Vulgate):
Apostoliki Diakonia (LXX):
YLT (Young Literal Translation )(MT):
BBE (Bible in Basic English):
EOB Commentary:
THE SONS OF GOD AND THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN
This verse stands among the most mysterious and debated passages in all of Scripture, carrying profound theological weight for Orthodox understanding of the spiritual realm, human nature, and the cosmic consequences of sin.
Patristic Interpretation: The Church Fathers offered two primary interpretations of “the sons of God” (bene ha-elohim). The more ancient view, found in some early Jewish sources and certain Fathers, understood these as fallen angels who transgressed their proper boundaries. However, the dominant Patristic tradition, championed by Saints John Chrysostom, Augustine, Ephrem the Syrian, and Cyril of Alexandria, interprets the “sons of God” as the righteous descendants of Seth, while the “daughters of men” represent the lineage of Cain. Chrysostom emphatically argues that angels, being bodiless powers, cannot engage in carnal union with humans. This Sethite interpretation emphasizes that the catastrophe preceding the Flood was fundamentally about the corruption of the faithful through intermarriage with the ungodly.
Spiritual and Ascetical Significance: For Orthodox spirituality, this passage serves as a sobering warning about the dangers of spiritual compromise. The beauty that ensnared the sons of God was not evil in itself—God created beauty—but the disordered desire and abandonment of discernment led to catastrophic consequences. The Fathers see here a pattern repeated throughout salvation history: the faithful remnant faces constant temptation to assimilate with surrounding corruption. Saint Ephrem notes that the Sethites had maintained separation and holiness for generations before succumbing to the allure of worldly beauty divorced from virtue.
Christological and Ecclesiological Dimensions: This passage illuminates by contrast the true union of divine and human that occurs in Christ. Where the illicit mingling in Genesis produced corruption and judgment, the Incarnation—the genuine union of God and humanity in the person of Jesus Christ—brings salvation and restoration. The Church, as the Bride of Christ, is called to maintain her purity and not be seduced by the spirit of the age, echoing Saint Paul’s concern that the Corinthians might be led astray from sincere devotion to Christ.
Liturgical Resonance: During Great Lent, the Church reads through Genesis, and this passage reminds the faithful of humanity’s capacity for profound spiritual decline. The pre-Flood narrative serves as a type of the final judgment, as Christ Himself teaches in Matthew 24:37-39, warning that the days before His return will mirror the heedlessness of Noah’s generation.
The verse ultimately calls Orthodox Christians to vigilance, discernment, and the preservation of spiritual integrity through communion with Christ and His Church.
The Book of Leviticus receives its English title from the Latin Vulgate, which is derived from the Greek Septuagint (LXX) title Leuitikon (Λευιτικόν), meaning “Levitical” or “pertaining to the Levites.”

The Book of Exodus receives its English title from the Greek Septuagint (LXX), where it is called Exodos (Ἔξοδος), meaning “departure” or “exit.” This name was chosen because the central

I. Date and Authorship Holy Tradition of the Orthodox Church, affirmed by the Fathers and the liturgical usage of the Church from the earliest centuries, attributes the Book of Genesis

Does Hebrews 11 on the Maccabees Show Stronger Alignment with 4 Maccabees than 2 Maccabees? Hebrews 11 (the famous “Hall of Faith” chapter) does not explicitly mention the Maccabees by